| | 438 [+] 590 inside left (lines .13-14). |
|
| Chadwick 1979; Chadwick 1998-1999, p. 31-37.
|
|
| [+] 590 (PTT, p. 184: « probably also from the same tablet is Xn 590 »);
|
|
| + fr.: Melena 1992-1993a, p. 78 [r. line .5];
|
|
| + frr.: Melena 1992-1993b, p. 314 [one on v., the other on r. line .4].
|
|
| All checkmarks (×) on the lat.dex. near the recto, and clearly in relation to the ends of the rulings (lines .10, .12-13, .15, .18-20, .25-26, .28); given the relative irregularity of their dimensions and placement, they seem to have been made in a second time by the scribe who wrote the text or by another, but shortly afterwards because, to the naked eye, the degree of humidity of clay was similar.
|
| .2 | ṭẹ-ḳọ[ PTT: ạ-ḳọ[ Bennett 1992, p. 112 very difficult.
|
| .3 | e-re-ṭạ[: better than e-re-ẹ[ (which PTT did not find convincing).
|
| .4 | Probably only N 1̣.
|
| .6 | Possibly AUR Ṇ 1.
|
| .9 | ro-]ụ-so: cf. Jn 829.10 (ṛọ-ụ-so , ko-re-te); perhaps P over ⟦Ṇ⟧; ⸤4[: only 2 units preserved.
|
| .10 | pa-ki-ja-ni-j̣ạ[: cf. On 300 .3 (]pa-ki-ja-ni-j̣ạ[ ] 'ko-re-te-ri').
|
| .12 | -do- over erasure, probably ⟦ḍẹ⟧.
|
| .17 | Perhaps qo-wo ,̣ [ or qo-wo-ṣị[.
|
| .22 | N over erasure.
|