PY Ma 216

	.1	ra-wa-ra-ta₂ *146 70 RI M 70 ḲẸ Ṃ 20 *152 30 O M 20 ME 15̣00[
	.2	vacat
	.3	pe-ru-si-nu-wo , o-pe-ro *146[ ] KE M 1̣ ⟦M⟧ *152 o 3 O-pe-ro M 2

		+ FR.: PT 1962, p. 161;
		+ 503: PTT, p. 193.
	.2	Perhaps over erasure.
	.3	-nu- over erasure; ⟦M⟧ *152 o 3 PTT: *152 o 3 Bennett 1992, p. 108 (« pebble after M 1̣ confounds reading »): the pebble in the erased area between the logograms KE and *152 does not prevent ⟦M⟧ from still being clearly visible; « the apparent o- [of ‘o-pe-ro’] is on the larger scale, which would normally demand a transcription O [or o], while -pe-ro are significantly smaller; a transcription O-pe-ro will well represent an instance of graphic crasis » (Bennett 1992, p. 108).
v.		Over erasure (the reading ⟦ẉị-ṇạ-j̣ọ,̣ ⟧ is probably a mirage).