PY Un 267

		Probably palimpsest.
	.4	Perhaps damaged divider after ze-so-me-no.
	.7-8	VIN in two different forms: VIN and VINb (see Bennett 1992, p. 109; cf. KN Uc 160.3 [= VINb] and .4 [= VIN]): the logogram in line .7 has the usual form, so that only the simplified form in line .8 requires a diacritical mark. In KT6 the differentiation is not indicated, which is probably a mistake; here, where we are certainly dealing with a single list of different products, the distinction is necessary (we did not, however, go so far as to follow Bennett’s subtle distinction between superscript and subscript « a » and « b »: VIN^a and VIN_b).
	.9-11	Over earlier ruling and erased text (several signs perhaps recognisable).
v.		Finger streaks (cf. Cn 4 v., Cn 608 v., Mn 456 v. and Vn 10 v.).